The Columbia Political Review is a student run non-partisan publication. The views represented here belong to their author and are not representative of the publication's political views or sympathies.

2019 Editorial Board


ISabelle harris


Celine Bacha

Managing Editors

Hannah wyatt


benjy sachs

TEChnology & marketing Manager

Kerem TUncer 

Social media Manager

Anthony cosentino

arts editor

Antara agarwal

Podcast producers

KRisten Akey

Hannah wyatt

Senior Editors

Jake tibbetts

Christina hill


Henry feldman


Jodi lessner

akshiti vats

Copy Editors

Sonia mahajan

grace protasiewicz

aryeh hajibay

Mary zaradich

OP-ed staff writers

raya tarawneh

eric scheuch

sophia houdaigui

ayse yucesan

aja johnson

antara agarwal

pallavi sreedhar

jasleen chaggar

ramsay eyre

ellie hansen

rachel barkin

sarah desouza

feven negussie

Feature staff writers

anthony cosentino

kristen akey

kristha jenvaiyavasjamai

maria castillo

stella cavedon

devyani goel

janine nassar

diana valcarcel soler

stephanie choi

katherine malus


The US Under Trump and APEC

The US Under Trump and APEC


Last year, world leaders met in Da Nang, Vietnam for the annual Asia Pacific Economic Summit. The three-day conference consisted of meetings between leaders from twenty-one of the world’s most important economies. Founded in 1989, APEC serves as a platform for business facilitation and an opportunity for international members to devote attention to the growing economies of the Asia Pacific. With observers including the Southeast Association of Asian Nations and the World Trade Organization, the APEC summit is an integral meeting for establishing trade guidelines in the region that can reverberate internationally. This meeting of world leaders gave President Donald Trump the platform  to reaffirm his commitment to the region’s economic success: which he ultimately chose not to. Organizations like APEC function only under the understanding that members are devoted to international economic success, and President Trump did nothing to assure members of his commitment.

        Since his inauguration, President Trump has exited regional trade agreements at an alarming rate. After leaving the Trans-Pacific Partnership days after his election, he was quick to reassure media the deal would save American workers from having to compete with lower wage countries. At APEC in November, Trump seemed to indiscriminately criticize APEC members for their apparent misuse of partnership agreements. In the middle of his remarks, the President took time to acknowledge that the United States “can no longer tolerate these chronic trade abuses, and we will not tolerate them.” He also underscored his preferred economic strategy: bilateral trade agreements as opposed to “large agreements that tie our hands, surrender our sovereignty, and make meaningful enforcement practically impossible.” Trump also disparaged the World Trade Organization for “product dumping, subsidized goods, currency manipulation, and predatory industrial policies.”

With his inflammatory remarks, Trump has set a new precedent for United States economic policy. A shift from regionally focused, targeted investment to specialized agreements on a case-by-case basis will ultimately, even if implemented perfectly, lead to an increasingly complicated web of rules and regulations. Promising these bilateral agreements to interested nations is an additionally bold claim for Trump, who has left Ambassador positions in Australia, South Korea, and Singapore vacant: all members of APEC.

Reunification in Cyprus: a New Deal is Feasible, so long as the Guarantors Permit it

Reunification in Cyprus: a New Deal is Feasible, so long as the Guarantors Permit it

Art, LGBTQ+, and the Middle East: How to talk about the oppressed without  talking about The Oppressed

Art, LGBTQ+, and the Middle East: How to talk about the oppressed without talking about The Oppressed