The Columbia Political Review is a student run non-partisan publication. The views represented here belong to their author and are not representative of the publication's political views or sympathies.

2018 Editorial Board

Editor-in-Chief

BANI SAPRA

Publisher

ISABELLE HARRIS

Design editor

Theresa yang 

Marketing Director

Dimitrius Keeler

arts editor

PEYTON AYERS

web editors

IRIS FRANGOU

MATHEIU SABBAGH

CHRISTIAN GONZALEZ

Managing Editors

ANAMARIA LOPEZ

VIVIAN CASILLAS

AUDREY DEGUERRERA 

Copy Chief

DANIELA APODACA

Senior Editors

BENJAMIN SACHS

HANNAH WYATT

SHEENA QIAO

ALEX SIEGAL

JAKE TIBETTS

KINZA HAQ

CAROLINE KELLY

DIMITRI VALLEJO

HELEN SAYEGH

SANAM JALINOUS

Song rhee

Copy Editors

SONIA MAHAJAN

HENRY FELDMAN

GRACE PROTASIEWICZ

 

Political Minutes: Barnard Workers UAW 2110

Political Minutes: Barnard Workers UAW 2110

On a dark, cold Monday evening nearly a hundred students, faculty member, and union organizers sat together at Barnard in the group’s first sign of solidarity. The struggle, pitting Barnard President Debora Spar against 130 of the lowest paid employees on campus, will determine whether these workers get to maintain basic labor rights ranging from serious cuts to healthcare and maternity leave to controversial proposals like the elimination of sexual harassment claims and child care leave.

Milbank's Ella Weed Room was filled with near one hundred Emilie Segura, a Barnard junior and leader of the Students Support Barnard Workers, opened the buzzing meeting with a short speech in which she declared, “We will not stand for cuts to basic benefits-healthcare, retirement, wage freezes- and especially since we are a women’s college, no cuts to maternity leave!” After introducing a panel of workers, some of whom had worked at Barnard for two or three decades, UAW Local 2110 president Maida Rosenstein explained the crisis from a worker’s perspective.

Workers make less than $35,000 a year or less, an extremely low wage in New York City. These low wages barely cover rent and living costs. Rosenstein maintained these wages were tolerated because the college’s underlying promise was to maintain workers’ benefits. This round of negotiations, however, the administration has stonewalled the workers, offering one painful proposal conveniently after President Obama’s address. Rosenstein spoke of these actions as part of larger anti-labor movement to characterize benefits as illegitimate. She roused the crowd saying, “We didn’t like the benefit cuts at Columbia, and we’re not going to take it at Barnard!”

Rosenstein also reminded the audience of the workers’ successful 1996 strike in which student activism helped pressure a settlement after months of negotiation. In an emotional recollection she spoke of how students unfurled banners at graduation saying, “Anti-Worker Equals Anti-Women”.

An employee of 32 years, Katherine Hendry, managed to wear a smile, joking she had just arrived from her Zumba class. But her face turned serious when addressing the contract crisis. The elderly woman from Georgia could not believe the administration was trying to divide students and workers by claiming tuition would have to be increased in order to pay workers fair wages. She recalled the ‘96 strike, saying, “The things they want back, we fought hard to get. And it’s hard to give up.”

The workers had a different idea of where the funding could come from. When I asked Rosenstein about whether President Spar, raking in around $300,000 a year, had offered to take a cut as a sign of good faith with the workers, she replied with a grin, “No! But I heard she gave up her limo.”

Students plan to continue meeting every Tuesday at 7:30 p.m.

Michael Ard

The Super Bowl of Electoral Politics