The Columbia Political Review is a student run non-partisan publication. The views represented here belong to their author and are not representative of the publication's political views or sympathies.

2019 Editorial Board


ISabelle harris


Celine Bacha

Managing Editors

Hannah wyatt


benjy sachs

TEChnology & marketing Manager

Kerem TUncer 

Social media Manager

Anthony cosentino

arts editor

Antara agarwal

Podcast producers

KRisten Akey

Hannah wyatt

Senior Editors

Jake tibbetts

Christina hill


Henry feldman


Jodi lessner

akshiti vats

Copy Editors

Sonia mahajan

grace protasiewicz

aryeh hajibay

Mary zaradich

OP-ed staff writers

raya tarawneh

eric scheuch

sophia houdaigui

ayse yucesan

aja johnson

antara agarwal

pallavi sreedhar

jasleen chaggar

ramsay eyre

ellie hansen

rachel barkin

sarah desouza

feven negussie

Feature staff writers

anthony cosentino

kristen akey

kristha jenvaiyavasjamai

maria castillo

stella cavedon

devyani goel

janine nassar

diana valcarcel soler

stephanie choi

katherine malus


Editor's Note

Much to the chagrin of the people around us, managing editor Ayushi Roy and I have been persistently arguing throughout this entire layout weekend. We’ve finally come to the point at which we’ve realized that neither of us is going to relent; nothing she says is going to convince me that stability should trump civil liberties (or the other way around, in her case). This type of ideological disagreement and debate is what makes me love this publication. Since our inception, we have prided ourselves on being a “multi-partisan” magazine. People often ask me, “What does that even mean? Why don’t you just call yourselves a non-partisan magazine?” We are by no means a non-partisan magazine. Our writers hail from every political leaning and emphatically express their views without any inhibitions. That’s what makes us unique in a world of journalism in which political publications are quickly pigeonholed into one side or the other. This issue marks our 10th year of existence and I’m incredibly proud that we have stayed true to our ideals.

This issue is especially remarkable in portraying the wide array of ideological positions that our writers hold. In A Modest Proposal, Hussein Elbakri comes out in strong support of the basic policies in Obama’s health care law but proposes a shift in the framing of the debate itself. William Parish IV takes a more critical view of the legal underpinnings of the health policies passed by the Obama administration, specifically in the case of the mandated contraceptives coverage, urging the government to refrain from overstepping its role. This very debate has exploded into a national conversation about women’s rights. As a result, we have brought together CU Democrats, College Republicans, and Columbia Right to Life to share their thoughts on what they believe the notion of women’s rights entails and whether it extends to having the right to terminate a pregnancy.

As my tenure as editor-in-chief comes to a close, I must say that it’s been quite an amazing run. I’ve been blessed to have such an intelligent, energetic, and committed editorial board, without which none of my dreams for this publication would have come to fruition. I am confident that our incoming editor-in-chief, Constance Boozer, will continue to steer this magazine forward. After all, much of our accomplishments this past year were undoubtedly the result of her hard work. I’m excited to see the places this magazine will go under her leadership.

I wish you all the best of luck on your final exams! I hope this issue serves as a good break amidst the craze of studying.



Obama's Non-political Women Speech

Obama's Non-political Women Speech

Points for Participation