The Columbia Political Review is a student run non-partisan publication. The views represented here belong to their author and are not representative of the publication's political views or sympathies

2017 Editorial Board

Editor-in-Chief

Anamaria lopez

 

Design editor

Theresa yang 

Marketing Director

Huhe yaN

arts editors

michelle huang

charly voelkel

lead web editor

poorvi bellur

Managing Editors

amanda kam

dimitrius keeler

shambhavi Tiwari 

karen yuan

Copy Chief

Maggie Toner

Senior Editors

vivian casillas

audrey deGuerrera

brian gao

belle harris

melissa ho

jahan nanji

sheena qiao

bani sapra

nina zweig

Copy Editors

sahana narayanan

song rhee

Anyone remember the FTAA?

Anyone remember the FTAA?  Probably not. The Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) was supposed to be revolutionary. Lowering or eliminating tariffs on thousands of goods in every country between Canada and Argentina, the treaty was heralded as a breakthrough in Western relations when first announced at the 1994 Summit of the Americas. But today, the FTAA is dead in the water. Instead, as a result of domestic and international hand-wringing, multiple bilateral agreements have been negotiated and then subsequently postponed.

Why? As any first-year student of economics could tell you, the logic of free trade agreements is sound. Increased competition and access to resources, coupled with a decrease in job-killing tariffs and ‘protectionist’ policies lead to increased economic growth and employment. NAFTA  – the trilateral trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico – since its inception has resulted in a threefold increase in trade between the US and Canada and a quadrupling of trade between the US and Mexico. While environmental and human rights concerns are important and need to be addressed, it is undeniable that NAFTA and other free trade agreements are vital in an increasingly interconnected Western Hemisphere.

So why am I writing about this now? Quite simply, free trade with our neighbors is the fastest and surest way to ensure economic growth in the US. With the American Jobs Act and its financial stimulus politically untenable and with the Federal Reserve unwilling to put its legitimacy further on the line, new avenues for economic growth must be negotiated. Furthermore, free trade remains one the few issues where both American political parties find common ground, reducing the risk of political deadlock when passing legislation.

Beyond the obvious economic ramifications, free trade sends a strong signal to party countries that the US is open to cultural integration as well. It sends a message of “We see you as an equal partner, do business with us.” It is a lien that has been lacking in the politics of benign neglect that has characterized American foreign policy towards Latin America for the past 25 years. Free trade is a win-win. It represents a non-partisan approach towards increased economic and political exchange, and should be a key tool in a re-engagement with our southern neighbors. Free-trade agreements with Colombia and Panama, negotiated under George W. Bush, are expected to finally come affect next year. Today the FTAA is a far-off fantasy, thanks largely to the efforts of far-left iconoclasts (particularly, Hugo Chavez) to derail any sort of meaningful dialogue with the perceived "neo-imperialist" interests of the US or Canada. However, the pursuit of bilateral trade agreements with Latin American countries should continue to be a tool in American diplomacy, forging deeper cultural and economic ties in our hemisphere.

American Politics Illuminated

You’re No Teddy Roosevelt