The Columbia Political Review is a student run non-partisan publication. The views represented here belong to their author and are not representative of the publication's political views or sympathies.

2019 Editorial Board


ISabelle harris


Celine Bacha

Managing Editors

Hannah wyatt


benjy sachs

TEChnology & marketing Manager

Kerem TUncer 

Social media Manager

Anthony cosentino

arts editor

Antara agarwal

Podcast producers

KRisten Akey

Hannah wyatt

Senior Editors

Jake tibbetts

Christina hill


Henry feldman


Jodi lessner

akshiti vats

Copy Editors

Sonia mahajan

grace protasiewicz

aryeh hajibay

Mary zaradich

OP-ed staff writers

raya tarawneh

eric scheuch

sophia houdaigui

ayse yucesan

aja johnson

antara agarwal

pallavi sreedhar

jasleen chaggar

ramsay eyre

ellie hansen

rachel barkin

sarah desouza

feven negussie

Feature staff writers

anthony cosentino

kristen akey

kristha jenvaiyavasjamai

maria castillo

stella cavedon

devyani goel

janine nassar

diana valcarcel soler

stephanie choi

katherine malus


Anyone remember the FTAA?

Anyone remember the FTAA?  Probably not. The Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) was supposed to be revolutionary. Lowering or eliminating tariffs on thousands of goods in every country between Canada and Argentina, the treaty was heralded as a breakthrough in Western relations when first announced at the 1994 Summit of the Americas. But today, the FTAA is dead in the water. Instead, as a result of domestic and international hand-wringing, multiple bilateral agreements have been negotiated and then subsequently postponed.

Why? As any first-year student of economics could tell you, the logic of free trade agreements is sound. Increased competition and access to resources, coupled with a decrease in job-killing tariffs and ‘protectionist’ policies lead to increased economic growth and employment. NAFTA  – the trilateral trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico – since its inception has resulted in a threefold increase in trade between the US and Canada and a quadrupling of trade between the US and Mexico. While environmental and human rights concerns are important and need to be addressed, it is undeniable that NAFTA and other free trade agreements are vital in an increasingly interconnected Western Hemisphere.

So why am I writing about this now? Quite simply, free trade with our neighbors is the fastest and surest way to ensure economic growth in the US. With the American Jobs Act and its financial stimulus politically untenable and with the Federal Reserve unwilling to put its legitimacy further on the line, new avenues for economic growth must be negotiated. Furthermore, free trade remains one the few issues where both American political parties find common ground, reducing the risk of political deadlock when passing legislation.

Beyond the obvious economic ramifications, free trade sends a strong signal to party countries that the US is open to cultural integration as well. It sends a message of “We see you as an equal partner, do business with us.” It is a lien that has been lacking in the politics of benign neglect that has characterized American foreign policy towards Latin America for the past 25 years. Free trade is a win-win. It represents a non-partisan approach towards increased economic and political exchange, and should be a key tool in a re-engagement with our southern neighbors. Free-trade agreements with Colombia and Panama, negotiated under George W. Bush, are expected to finally come affect next year. Today the FTAA is a far-off fantasy, thanks largely to the efforts of far-left iconoclasts (particularly, Hugo Chavez) to derail any sort of meaningful dialogue with the perceived "neo-imperialist" interests of the US or Canada. However, the pursuit of bilateral trade agreements with Latin American countries should continue to be a tool in American diplomacy, forging deeper cultural and economic ties in our hemisphere.

American Politics Illuminated

You’re No Teddy Roosevelt